I also feel like Dawkins is like these scholars I found researching zombies. Most of the articles pertaining to zombies were studies disproving their existence, and it's like "DUH! We know zombies don't exist so why do you gotta prove it?" I dunno but that's just me. And yes I equated God to zombies... ZOMBIE GOD!!!! WAAAAAAHHHHH GET YOUR SHOTGUNS!!! GET YOUR... whoops! Got lost in the moment...
A way to keep in touch and haggle! - Thats right! I wanna know what music you're into, what food your eating, what stories you're reading (web comics, news stories, new fiction, Pemberton times), what TV/movies struck you as awesome, ALL OF IT!! Just think of it like the Patriot Act, constantly checking up on our shared relatively inane existence, but with LOVE/HATE OF COURSE!!!
2 comments:
This is kinda cool and definitely worth reading. I've only glanced through the article, but it seems like the main (at least initial) argument against Dawkin's book is how his proofs that God exists are somehow erroneous, and although this is interesting, i feel like there are several other points worth mentioning that can be universally agreed upon lol!
But like I said, I've not actually read the article, but will def do so in the future, and check back when i do!!
Yeah agreed. His argument isn't quite solid, and at the end he says one of his problems is the lack of the philosophical argument of god. Le sigh, really?! Only a philosophy major...
Post a Comment